Super Lawyers
Illinois State Bar Association
Justia Lawyer Rating
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Avvo Rating
Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers BBB Business Review

Zimmer Hip Failure Lawsuits

Hips by ZimmerIn 2008, Zimmer Holdings, Inc. voluntarily recalled their Durom® Acetabular Component, also known as the Durom Cup under the pretense that their were issues with the surgical technique and training used to implant the device. However, this metal hip implant component has shown to have similar problems as other metal hip implant devices such as early failure and corrosion leading to injuries to many of the patients that received them. An estimated 12,000 people received these implants between 2006 and 2008, many put at risk for pain, suffering and additional surgery.

Zimmer Durom Acetabular Component Issues

Zimmer received FDA approval and began selling its Durom Cup in 2006. The component was comprised of a hip socket made from metal that was covered with a plasma coating. The idea was that the plasma coating would stimulate bone growth, holding the socket or cup in place around the bone instead of using a cement to keep the device in place. However, many patients did not respond to the plasma and bone growth, causing the Durom Cup to not adhere to the bone and move.

The result of this issue was that many patients that had the Zimmer Durom Cup implanted were having severe pain and even mobility issues. Some patients needed to have the component removed and replaced within several months of having it put in. This device had been touted to be more effective for long term use than other devices made of plastics or ceramic, with an expected life span of the device of 15-20 years. Yet many patients were needing to undergo revision surgery after only a year or two.

Problems associated with the Zimmer Durom Acetabular Component included:

  • Severe hip or back pain
  • Loss of mobility
  • Revision surgery

Zimmer Durom Cup Recall

After only two years on the market, the Durom Cup was voluntarily recalled by Zimmer on July 22, 2008. Although the company cited surgical techniques as the reason for the recall, the event occurred after Lawrence Dorr, M.D., a paid consultant for Zimmer, wrote a letter in 2008 outlining issues that he had found regarding the component. Some of the problems he cited in his letter included:

  • The Durom Cup was often failing within months of implant
  • Patients were complaining of pain from the device
  • The implant was becoming loose and in need of replacement/revision within the first year

However, Zimmer disregarded Dorr’s observations and continued to deny any problem with the device beyond the need for additional training. They maintained that the device was safe as long as it was implanted correctly.

Patients that had a Zimmer Durom Cup implanted and experienced pain, loss of mobility and even needed revision surgery are seeking compensation for their injuries from Zimmer. A multidistrict litigation (MDL) was created to handle the many lawsuits from the thousands of patients that were experiencing issues with their Zimmer hip replacement. Patients could receive reimbursement for medical and other costs as well as monetary compensation for their pain and suffering.

Get Legal Help now for Zimmer Hip Defects

The Illinois defective medical device lawyers at Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers LLC represent people who have suffered complications after receiving a Zimmer hip. Our attorneys are familiar with the complications associated with these devices and the pending litigation. Allow us to answer any questions you have without any obligation.

Below is the latest information related to the Zimmer Durom hips and pending litigation:

Related defective medical devices: Stryker Hip Lawsuit

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Jonathan Rosenfeld was professionally objective, timely, and knowledgeable. Also, his advice was extremely effective regarding my case. In addition, Jonathan was understanding and patient pertaining to any of my questions or concerns. I was very happy with the end result and I highly recommend Jonathan Rosenfeld. Michonne Proulx
★★★★★
Extremely impressed with this law firm. They took control of a bad motorcycle crash that left my uncle seriously injured. Without any guarantee of a financial recovery, they went out and hired accident investigators and engineers to help prove how the accident happened. I am grateful that they worked on a contingency fee basis as there was no way we could have paid for these services on our own. Ethan Armstrong
★★★★★
This lawyer really helped me get compensation for my motorcycle accident case. I know there is no way that I could have gotten anywhere near the amount that Mr. Rosenfeld was able to get to settle my case. Thank you. Daniel Kaim
★★★★★
Jonathan helped my family heal and get compensation after our child was suffered a life threatening injury at daycare. He was sympathetic and in constant contact with us letting us know all he knew every step of the way. We were so blessed to find Jonathan! Giulia
★★★★★
Jonathan did a great job helping my family navigate through a lengthy lawsuit involving my grandmother's death in a nursing home. Through every step of the case, Jonathan kept my family informed of the progression of the case. Although our case eventually settled at a mediation, I really was impressed at how well prepared Jonathan was to take the case to trial. Lisa