Super Lawyers
Illinois State Bar Association
Justia Lawyer Rating
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Avvo Rating
BBB Accredited Business

Lawyers Value Brain Injury Cases in Illinois Truck Accidents

Personal Injury Brain Injury ValueThe brain is an incredibly complex and delicate organ that during an accident is extremely vulnerable. The force and severity of truck accidents magnify the risk of catastrophic injuries. The compiled data below involves trucking accident settlements and verdicts in Illinois and other jurisdictions where the injured parties suffered various types of brain injuries.

While the information below is a good starting point for learning about how a truck accident case involving a brain injury (TBI) may be valued, there certainly are many other factors which deserve to be evaluated. Contact our office for a free review of your truck accident case with an attorney who has experience with a situation similar to yours. 

2013; ILLINOIS; $80,771 JURY AWARD:

In this case, a young woman had stopped at a right light, waiting for the light to turn, when a large truck came screeching behind her and could not stop in time to avoid a collision. The commercial truck rear-ended her car sending it into the middle of the intersection and wounding her in the process. 

She suffered a concussion as well as a neck and brain strain. The victim sued the truck driver and the driver’s employer arguing that the latter was vicariously responsible under the theory of respondeat superior. However, her claim against the company was not supported in court because the trucker was not working that day but was just driving around for personal reasons. 

The female victim was successful in resolving the truckers liability case though. The truck driver did not contest liability. He only denied the amount of damages that she asked for in her complaint. A jury found that an appropriate award for the crash and her injuries equaled $80,771.

2008; TEXAS; $1,600,000 SETTLEMENT:

The defendant in this controversy was driving a large tanker truck on a rainy, dark night and was attempting to turn into a side street so half of his vehicle was sprawled across both lanes. The truck sat idle in the road for a few minutes before pulling into the alley. During this short break, the plaintiff drove down the other lane in the opposite direction. 

Because of the darkness and the truck’s blinding lights, the victim could not see that the truck was obstructing his way. He crashed into the tanker truck which caused a concussion, multiple broken bones, and lacerations. The injured victim sued the truck driver and the trucker's boss for negligence. The defendants replied that the plaintiff’s negligence overrode anything that they did. 

The defendants also alleged that the injured victim should have slowed down, kept a better lookout, and noticed the truck was trying to turn into the alley. They initially balked at settlement and seemed content to fight it out in trial. Yet, as the court date approached and the plaintiff’s extensive injuries became apparent, they offered to settle possibly because they were afraid of what a sympathetic jury would award. The victim received $1,600,000.

2015; INDIANA; $171,216 JURY AWARD:

This incident started when a police officer got off from work before driving to his part-time job. The officer worked as a security guard at a local manufacturing company and was not far from the building when he attempted to enter an intersection. Before entering the crossroads, and without having the right of way, a truck turned left in front of him

The sudden turn caused the off-duty police officer to veer off the road into a ditch. His car rolled over and the victim sustained injuries including a traumatic brain injury. The plaintiff sued the truck driver and the truck driver’s employer because the former was working at the time of the accident. 

His suit alleged that the defendant driver did not have the right of way, turned when he should not have, and caused the plaintiff’s car to roll into the ditch leading to his damages. The defendant replied that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent because he overreacted and that he was exaggerating his injuries. 

The jury sided with the plaintiff but also apportioned him nearly 20% responsibility for the incident. When you also consider that this is a rather low award for brain injuries, $171,216, it seems as though the jury may have found a compromise between both sides.

2008; CALIFORNIA; $1,159,354 JURY AWARD:

Very early one morning on a busy California road, a welder was driving to work in his Ford pickup truck. Seeing a green light, he drove through an intersection, but another vehicle travelling perpendicular to his truck was late in reacting to the red light and slammed into the side of his truck. The crash was extensive because the other vehicle was a semi-truck carrying two heavy trailers. 

The collision sent the man’s Ford truck flying several hundred feet and rolling into a canal. Of the many injuries the welder suffered, his most severe included a brain injury, knee injury, and internal bleeding. 

In the subsequent lawsuit, the defendant did not deny that he was responsible for the incident but did argue that the man’s future medical needs were not as extensive as claimed so the matter did go to trial over the issue of damages. The jury awarded the plaintiff $1,159,354.

2001; FLORIDA; $830,125 JURY AWARD:

This case involved a child near a mall who was leaving with his friends on a bike when he entered a crosswalk. He was the first of his group to ride out into the street and unfortunately was hit by a truck. The boy sustained a traumatic brain injury as well as a cervical sprain because of the accident. 

Additionally, because of the brain injury, he was experiencing numbness in his leg. This case went to trial because there was a large dispute around who was at fault. The child even acknowledged that he saw the truck prior to the collision but thought the driver saw him. 

The defendant thought this was proof that he was innocent. Also, he showed that the boy did not call an ambulance or seek any medical care until days after the crash took place. The jury took all of this into consideration and then awarded the boy $830,125 for his injuries despite the defendant’s strong arguments. Here is the damages breakdown of his award:

  • Medical and Lost Wages:
  • Pain and Suffering:
  • Total:
  • $530,125
  • $300,000
  • $830,125

2007; ILLINOIS; $203,806 JURY AWARD:
This accident started when a truck driver rear-ended a car that then kicked off a chain-reaction crash involving five other vehicles. The woman in the first car hit sued the truck driver for negligence. She said that she suffered a brain injury caused by the crash that affected her memory, emotions, and cognitive abilities. Due to these injuries, she alleged she could no longer continue her employment as a store manager. 

The defendant truck driver could not deny that he was responsible for the seven-car pileup but denied that the incident affected the plaintiff as much as she claimed. In particular, he refuted the contention that she could not work as a manager of a retail store anymore. The jury found for the plaintiff for $203,806 in the following fashion:

  • Lost Wages:
  • Pain and Suffering:
  • Punitive:
  • Total:
  • $3,806
  • $20,000
  • $180,000
  • $203,806

2014; CALIFORNIA; $4,250,000 SETTLEMENT:

The plaintiff in this incident was a middle-aged man riding a forklift when the defendant ran him over in a truck. Apparently, the victim was working outside moving large equipment for his company. The defendant did not see him or the forklift and, therefore, did not reduce his speed before colliding with him. 

The impact sent the plaintiff flying into the air causing a traumatic brain injury. He was in a coma for several weeks and suffered permanent disability and memory loss. The subsequent lawsuit charged the defendant truck driver for negligence by failing to reduce his speed, keep a proper lookout, and control his vehicle. Both sides settled this dispute for $4,250,000.

Do You Have a Loved One Seriously Injured in a Trucking Accident?

Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers LLC appreciates the significance a serious injury from a truck accident has both on the individual and his or her family. Our attorneys regularly retain the services of experts in the fields of physical medicine, rehabilitation, and economics to ensure the full extent of your injury is conveyed to a jury or insurance company evaluating your case. Contact our office for a free case review today and an attorney will be in touch with you shortly to discuss your legal options.

For More Information

For more information about , please contact Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers LLC today by calling 888-424-5757. Talk to a lawyer now. Free consultation.

Client Reviews
Jonathan Rosenfeld was professionally objective, timely, and knowledgeable. Also, his advice was extremely effective regarding my case. In addition, Jonathan was understanding and patient pertaining to any of my questions or concerns. I was very happy with the end result and I highly recommend Jonathan Rosenfeld. Michonne Proulx
Extremely impressed with this law firm. They took control of a bad motorcycle crash that left my uncle seriously injured. Without any guarantee of a financial recovery, they went out and hired accident investigators and engineers to help prove how the accident happened. I am grateful that they worked on a contingency fee basis as there was no way we could have paid for these services on our own. Ethan Armstrong
This lawyer really helped me get compensation for my motorcycle accident case. I know there is no way that I could have gotten anywhere near the amount that Mr. Rosenfeld was able to get to settle my case. Thank you. Daniel Kaim
Jonathan helped my family heal and get compensation after our child was suffered a life threatening injury at daycare. He was sympathetic and in constant contact with us letting us know all he knew every step of the way. We were so blessed to find Jonathan! Giulia
Jonathan did a great job helping my family navigate through a lengthy lawsuit involving my grandmother's death in a nursing home. Through every step of the case, Jonathan kept my family informed of the progression of the case. Although our case eventually settled at a mediation, I really was impressed at how well prepared Jonathan was to take the case to trial. Lisa