Attorneys Value Back & Neck Injury Truck Accidents in Illinois

The extraordinary pressure that truck accidents create put lots of pain and stress on the human body. Neck and back injuries are incredibly common in these circumstances and, unfortunately, incredibly costly. Below we have compiled some truck accident verdicts and settlements from different jurisdictions in Illinois related to people with back and neck injuries. 

If you have been injured in a truck crash case in Illinois, we invite you to contact our office for a free case review with an experienced attorney. All of our cases are handled on a contingency fee basis-- meaning there is never a legal fee charged unless there is a recovery for you. 

This controversy involved a sleepy truck driver and an old country road when he was driving one morning and accidentally let his car run off the road and hit a light pole. The pole fell over and obstructed most of both lanes. In the other direction, another driver approached the area but could not avoid the obstruction. 

The other driver injured his lower back, hip, and shoulder in the collision and sued the truck driver for negligence. The suit alleged that the defendant should have kept a better lookout, applied the brakes sooner, and avoided the light pole. The defendant could not mount a serious defense, so he settled. The plaintiff received $15,000 in an out-of-court settlement.

A cab driver was going about his route one night when a truck suddenly backed out into his lane. There was no time to react, and the cab slammed into the side of the other vehicle. The cab driver was severely injured. He sustained a serious neck injury as well as second-degree burns

He also reported to psychiatrists that he had post-traumatic stress disorder. Eventually, he sued the truck driver for negligence. His suit stated that the defendant should have looked before backing out into the street and otherwise maintained his vehicle better. 

The defendant retorted that the plaintiff was the one to blame. In his opinion, the cab driver was driving too fast, not paying attention to the road, and not monitoring the area. Failing to find any common ground, they went to trial where the jury sided with the plaintiff for $2,368,000 for the following damages amounts:

  • Medical Costs:
  • Lost Wages:
  • Pain and Suffering:
  • Compensatory:
  • Punitive:
  • Total:
  • $153,000
  • $450,000
  • $1,000,000
  • $15,000
  • $750,000
  • $2,368,000

A woman was driving her family on a busy highway near downtown Chicago when a truck in the neighboring lane immediately veered into hers. The jolt caused her to react and go into the opposite lane except there was a car there. She collided with that vehicle and then into a bunch of barrels. The incident caused the mother severe cervical strain. 

She sued the truck driver for starting the accident. At trial, the defendant truck driver replied that the woman should have kept a better lookout herself, driven slower, and sounded her alarm before colliding with the third vehicle. The jury sided with the woman and awarded her $55,000 for her injuries including the following damages:

  • Medical Costs:
  • Pain and Suffering:
  • Loss of Normal Life:
  • Total:
  • $15,000
  • $30,000
  • $10,000
  • $55,000

2011; CONNECTICUT; $1,015,084 JURY AWARD:
truck driver became a victim when he was driving his dump truck down a narrow back alley when another car crossed the yellow line and hit him head-on. Police reports later verified that the driver who initiated the crash was drunk and high on drugs

The truck driver sustained extraordinary injuries to his spine as well as brain and other harms. He sued the car driver for negligence. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff’s injuries were exaggerated and dismissed the extent of his damages. Maybe due to the intoxication, the defendant’s pleas fell on deaf ears to the jury. They awarded the plaintiff a hefty sum of $1,015,084 for these damages:

  • Medical Costs:
  • Lost Wages:
  • Non-Economic Damages:
  • Total:
  • $42,584
  • $132,500
  • $840,000
  • $1,015,084

2008; WISCONSIN; $46,714 JURY AWARD:
This dispute involved two trucks at a weigh station, where one of them was awaiting service and the second one slid into the back of the first truck. The driver was still in the vehicle and sustained moderate whiplash injuries caused by the collision. 

The injured trucker sued the other truck driver and the driver’s employer for negligence. His suit alleged that the defendant employee should have reduced his speed and kept watch to avoid the crash. The defendants admitted that they were responsible for the incident and negligent in causing the crash but denied that the plaintiff’s injuries were as severe as he claimed. Thus, the sole issue at trial was the extent of damages. The jury found that the appropriate amount was $46,714.

Here, a tractor-trailer truck caused a large chain-reaction crash involving multiple vehicles. One victim was traveling by car and sustained multiple back injuries and whiplash that prevented him from being able to return to work. 

Faced with the obvious prospect of losing in court, he advised his counsel to settle quickly with all victims. This plaintiff received $305,000 in an out-of-court settlement for his economic and non-economic damages.

2001; ILLINOIS; $3,000,000 SETTLEMENT:
The 33 years old victim, in this case, was driving through a construction zone when a tractor-trailer truck rear-ended his vehicle. that left him severally injured. He had extensive damage to his neck and back and needed multiple spinal surgeries to correct it. 

Eventually, the victim sued the truck driver who initiated the collision for negligence. His suit claimed that the defendant should have kept a more significant distance from his car, paid better attention, and maintained better control of his truck at all times preceding the crash. The defendant flatly rejected these allegations and asserted that a third-party motorist was responsible for the incident. 

The jury sided with the plaintiff and awarded $3,000,000 to resolve the case. This figure is interesting because the only economic damages that the plaintiff prayed for in his suit were $100,000 for past medical costs. Thus, the jury was very liberal in awarding him such a high amount.

This incident involved a police officer who got out of his car on a Washington highway to inspect the area after parking his vehicle just off the road and putting on all of the emergency lights. Then, without warning, a truck suddenly jackknifed right in front of him before hitting his car. The car then collided into him as he was nearby. 

The officer sustained multiple strains and sprains to his back and neck. Doctors later testified that he might need spinal surgery to correct the issue. The cop sued the truck driver for negligence and demanded $500,000. The defendant countered with $65.000. They agreed to compromise and move on from the matter for $315,000.

2013; FLORIDA; $800,000 SETTLEMENT:
Interestingly, this dispute involved two semi-trucks where one truck stopped at a red light when the other rear-ended it. The driver of the first vehicle claimed that the incident left him with a herniated disc as well as a shoulder surgery

The defendant dismissed the notion that the crash caused these issues and suggested instead that the disc and shoulder problems stemmed from preexisting injuries. However, the defendant might have been threatened by the plaintiff’s expert testimony because the case did not go far before it settled for $800,000.

Are You Coping With Lumbar or Cervical Injuries Related to an Illinois Truck Crash?

You are not alone. Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers have experience representing people with serious injuries related to commercial vehicle crashes. If you are in need of a law firm who is committed to protecting your rights following an Illinois trucking crash, we invite you to contact our office for a free case review

Client Reviews
Jonathan Rosenfeld was professionally objective, timely, and knowledgeable. Also, his advice was extremely effective regarding my case. In addition, Jonathan was understanding and patient pertaining to any of my questions or concerns. I was very happy with the end result and I highly recommend Jonathan Rosenfeld.
Extremely impressed with this law firm. They took control of a bad motorcycle crash that left my uncle seriously injured. Without any guarantee of a financial recovery, they went out and hired accident investigators and engineers to help prove how the accident happened. I am grateful that they worked on a contingency fee basis as there was no way we could have paid for these services on our own. Ethan Armstrong, Google User
This lawyer really helped me get compensation for my motorcycle accident case. I know there is no way that I could have gotten anywhere near the amount that Mr. Rosenfeld was able to get to settle my case. Thank you. Daniel Kaim, Avvo User
Jonathan helped my family heal and get compensation after our child was suffered a life threatening injury at daycare. He was sympathetic and in constant contact with us letting us know all he knew every step of the way. We were so blessed to find Jonathan! Giulia, Avvo User
Jonathan did a great job helping my family navigate through a lengthy lawsuit involving my grandmother's death in a nursing home. Through every step of the case, Jonathan kept my family informed of the progression of the case. Although our case eventually settled at a mediation, I really was impressed at how well prepared Jonathan was to take the case to trial. Lisa, Avvo User
Contact Us for a Free Consultation (888) 424-5757
Chicago Office Map