Super Lawyers
Illinois State Bar Association
Justia Lawyer Rating
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Avvo Rating
BBB Accredited Business

Stryker Hip Lawsuit

The Aftermath of the Stryker Recall and Pending Litigation

lawyers-for-recalled-stryker-hip-lawsuitsDid you undergo revision surgery to remove and replace a Stryker implant? Have you had difficulty with your medical device since it was implanted? Did you replace their rejuvenate modular device and wonder if the FDA recalled it?

At Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, LLC, our personal injury attorneys represent patients who have been harmed by their doctor through a medical procedure, including a Stryker hip replacement and ABG II modular-neck hip. Call us at (888) 424-5757 (toll-free phone number) or use the contact form today to schedule a free consultation.

Let's discuss the case's merits and build the case to ensure your family receives the financial compensation you deserve.

Thousands of patients across the United States and worldwide have been left grappling with the painful effects. In July 2012, Stryker Orthopaedics initiated a voluntary recall of two of its Stryker hip replacement products due to issues regarding the harmful effects of these devices on patients.

Stryker hip lawsuit addresses effects such as exposure to increased toxic metal levels, increased pain, increased swelling, and the need for painful revision surgeries.

The voluntary recall has raised the awareness of patients throughout the United States. Perhaps you are one of the many patients who received a Stryker implant before July 2012 and are concerned about whether you may have a defective implant.

If you believe that you may have a recalled Stryker implant and one of the eligible U.S patients, then here are some steps that you can take for your situation.

Contacting Your Physician to Discuss the Recall

Contacting your physician is an initial step that you can take to proceed with treatment for your defective Stryker implant or ABG II modular neck.

Your physician will be able to address some of the concerns that you have, such as the following:

  • Type of Stryker implant you have
  • Whether you have a Stryker hip implant
  • Whether you may have a defective Stryker  implant
  • Address pain, swelling, or adverse local tissue responses that you may be having due to Stryker hip implants
  • Address whether a Stryker implant may need to be removed from your body
  • Address whether you may be a candidate for hip revision surgery and require this invasive procedure

There are some common signs that you may have a failed or defective implant. You should pay attention to any pain you experience in your daily activities, such as walking, standing, performing household chores, or even sitting at an office desk.

You should also be aware of the change in the appearance of any skin surrounding the hip implant. If you notice redness, swelling, or the development of tumors, then these could be signs that you have a defective implant.

Discuss The Best Treatment Options for You

When you meet with a physician, you will discuss the best treatment options available to you.

Unfortunately, these treatment options typically require complete removal of the implant and hip revision surgery. You should know and understand that this surgery is a very invasive procedure that can cause severe pain.

Research studies have indicated that adverse local tissue responses tend to be harmful after hip revision surgery. In addition, a research study conducted by Joshua J. Jacobs, MD, has reported that patients requiring hip revision surgeries have suffered from the development of "pseudotumors" as a result.

Consider The Need for Removal of Stryker Hip Implants

Ultimately, you may need to obtain a complete removal of the hip implant from your hip region. Another issue with these hip implants has been that patients are at risk of suffering from metallosis.

Metallosis is blood metal poisoning that can occur due to increased metal levels within the bloodstream. Recalled hip implants have a known tendency to dispense with increased titanium, chromium, and cobalt levels.

Consider The Need for Hip Revision Surgery

If you decide to proceed with a hip revision surgery after consulting with your physician, be aware that you may be eligible for damages to cover the costs of this surgery.

In addition, you may be eligible to receive damages, lost wages, loss of consortium, and other medical expenses that you suffer from the failed implant.

The recalled Rejuvenate and ABG II  implants have caused immense pain and suffering in patients.

Patients who have required hip revision surgery due to these defective hip implants are often unable to return to work for months at a time. They may also be unable to carry on with their daily lives or even walk.

Stryker Hip Implants

Stryker Orthopaedics has been accused of making multiple metal-on-metal implants that do not function as designed or expected. As a result, the company has faced many stryker hip lawsuits from injured patients who have had device replacements through revision surgeries.

The two hip stems manufactured by the company that has been recalled are Rejuvenate and ABG II. The active ingredients in Stryker's hip plants are titanium, cobalt, and chromium.

In 2014, Stryker Orthopaedics agreed to pay $1.43 billion to resolve Stryker hip lawsuits regarding its ABG II and Rejuvenate metal-on-metal hop stems.

As per this settlement, each plaintiff would get around $600,000 in compensation.

The company is not under hot waters again as its anatomic Lfit V40 femoral heads are causing side effects, such as pain, dislocation, inflammation, and loss of mobility. If you have recently received an anatomic V40 femoral head and are experiencing these symptoms, you can file a  hip lawsuit to be compensated by Stryker.

How Long Does the Stryker Implant Last?

The Stryker implant lasts for a long time, but the company is facing a barrage of implant lawsuits. In addition, it's been reported that at least three hospitals in Colorado canceled surgeries due to faulty Stryker Rejuvenate or Stryker ABG II Implants.

Stryker had to recall the Rejuvenate and  ABG II  implants because they were causing metal shrapnel to be released into patients' bloodstreams.

Stryker has also faced lawsuits over the Trident ACET interference screw because it was loosening up early and fracturing.

Typically, a prosthetic can last anywhere from 15 to 20 years. However, the longevity of the implant also depends on the patient's age and physical activity.

For example, someone who is very active and overweight would expect their hip implant to last longer than a less physically active person.

Stryker Hip Implants Causing Injuries

The following three hip implants by Stryker are causing injuries in patients and are included in lawsuits:

  • Stryker LFIT V40 Femoral Head
  • Stryker ABG II Modular Neck hip stems
  • Stryker Rejuvenate Modular Neck hip stems

The 510(k) Premarket Notification Process was used to approve the Stryker implant devices. It's a fast approval process, allowing manufacturers to avoid clinical trials as they claim their product is similar to those already in the market.

As a result, the medical implants were not implanted in humans before being sold. Therefore, several patients had already been injured before the post-market reports started coming in.

The Rejuvenate and r ABG II Stryker implant devices were recalled in 2012 because the company could not reach a specific level of consistency regarding defects with the artificial joint.

The LFIT V40 femoral head was recalled because the company could not maintain adequate quality control on their products as they shipped defective metal hip implants that failed prematurely.

There are four main side effects of Stryker implant failure:

  • Severe pain, which may include radiating pain down the leg or back
  • Inability to walk without assistance due to severe joint damage.
  • Avascular necrosis (AVN) is when the blood supply to the bones affected by the implant failure is cut off, causing the bones to die because they are not receiving enough oxygen. Avascular necrosis can cause severe pain as well as lead to bone deformity and permanent disability.
  • Stiffness in the joint where hip implant failure took place

Stryker Hip Implant Lawsuits: V40 Femoral Head, Rejuvenate and ABG II

Stryker hip implant lawsuits are usually filed on behalf of patients seeking compensation for Stryker Rejuvenate or  ABG II hip implant-related injuries, including revision surgeries, infections, pain, and suffering.

To date, there have been more than 7,000  Rejuvenate implant lawsuits filed across the United States, with many more expected to be added.

Those who received Stryker's LFIT anatomic V40 Femoral Heads may be eligible to join one of the many lawsuit settlements. Stryker is reportedly facing a potential settlement of around $1 billion after allegations that its LFIT anatomic V40 femoral head caused severe injury to thousands of patients.

What Do Lawyers Argue?

In most Stryker  implant lawsuits, lawyers argue the following:

  • The company was negligent in designing the hip replacements.
  • Stryker failed to test the medical device and warn the patients and doctors about toxicity issues of the hip implant.
  • A Stryker hip replacement wAS defective during the manufacturing process, leading to a Taper Lock failure.

Taper lock failure refers to the inability of Stryker's Stylus metal-on-metal hip implant system to achieve proper fixation at the stem-head junction.

As a result, patients continue to suffer from degradation of their hips and extreme pain while not receiving the benefit of replacement surgery.

Along with severe pain,  hip implants also cause other complications. In the Stryker hip lawsuits, lawyers blame the implants' metal hip parts for being toxic to the individual's body. Till now, six of the company's hip replacement models have been in lawsuits.

Among them, three brands are involved in mass litigations. These include LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40 femoral heads, ABG II, and Rejuvenate.

Tritanium Acetabular Shell Lawsuits

Many patients have experienced complications upon getting the  Tritanium Acetabular Shell hip implants. These devices are supposed to replace the receiver's hip socket, fusing their bones by helping bone growth.

However, they aren't 100% functional and may loosen quickly following surgery. As a result, there's more pain that requires more surgery to be fixed.

Stryker implant issues can also lead to lifelong disabilities that could affect your ability to work and enjoy life.

By seeking legal help from an experienced personal injury attorney, you can explore all available options and hold Stryker accountable for the problems associated with their hip medical implant devices.

If a Stryker implant injured you, contact an attorney, and they will help you get compensation for pain and suffering, lost wages, and medical bills. Also, keep in mind that a hip replacement tends to last for years and not just a few months.

On top of that, revision surgeries are not only excruciating but also expensive. So, filing a Stryker hip lawsuit is your right to ensure you receive the financial compensation you deserve.

Rejuvenate and ABG II Settlement

The FDA recalled Stryker's Rejuvenate and ABG II artificial hips after failing to report patient deaths associated with these devices. The two models had been implanted in more than 680,000 people worldwide when they were recalled.

In June 2015, the company recalled some of their Rejuvenate and ABG II Hip Implants because a separator between parts of the medical device could fracture over time.

On July 21, 2016, it was announced that William Giles would receive $3 Million to settle his claim against Stryker relating to Rejuvenate and ABG II Hip Implants.

Stryker announced a second recall for  Rejuvenate/ABG II Hip Implants in November 2016 due to the possibility of separator fracture, which could cause metal debris to be released into the body.

In March 2017, Stryker settled 840 lawsuits filed by people that received  Rejuvenate or  ABG II hip implants.

In 2014, the company agreed on no a settlement program of   $1.43 billion and paid thousands of people who had filed lawsuits. In addition, the settlement was extended to more patients by 2016, increasing the total amount to around $2.2 billion.

The plaintiffs had until March 2017 to file a lawsuit as the company wanted to pay off the whole amount by the end of the year. However, by 2019, there were around 1,209 still pending in a federal court of Minnesota.

Timeline For Hip Replacement Lawsuits & Settlements

Meanwhile, there were more than 800 cases in New Jersey that were still pending in 2018. Here's a timeline to understand how the lawsuit panned out:

  • July 2012: The company withdrew ABGII and Rejuvenate hip implants from the market and alerted healthcare providers to beware of the implants' potential complications.
  • August 2012: A plaintiff filed the first hip lawsuit against the company in a state court of New Jersey.
  • June 2003: The federal lawsuits were combined into a Minnesota federal court by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
  • December 2013: The company agreed to pay, leading to the cancelation of the first trial.
  • November 2014: Stryker agreed to pay $1.4 billion to settle the case.
  • December 2016: The settlement was extended by the company.
  • March 2017: After the deadline passed, Stryker agreed  to pay every plaintiff by the end of the year
  • August 2019: 1,209 lawsuits were still pending in a Minnesotan federal court.

LFIT V40 Femoral Head Settlement

Stryker's LFIT V40 Femoral Head hip implant is one of the company's implants that have been recalled. The company recalled 42,519  LFIT v40 units as the complication rates were "higher than expected."

In 2018, the company announced a settlement agreement over the Rejuvenate hip implant. However, by 2019, 689 lawsuits were still pending against the company in a federal court of Minnesota.

The documents further confirmed that this agreement would take 100 other lawsuits over their modular hip medical devices from a New Jersey litigation into account too.

Stryker Corporation lawsuits are being filed against the manufacturer for many products, including Rejuvenate, ABG II, and ASR XL hip implants.

The company is accused of selling defective medical devices that have not lasted as advertised and have left patients with revision surgical procedures. Many patients who had surgery with the device underwent additional surgery to replace the defective implant.

Stryker has already settled over 100 lawsuits involving early versions of these implants at an average cost of $170K per patient with serious complications. So you might be entitled to compensation if you had one of their recalled medical devices implanted.

Call Stryker Hip Recall Lawyers for Help

Are you experiencing complications with your modular hip replacement? Did the FDA recall the medical device, or has your doctor suggested revision surgery to remove and replace the implant?

At Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, LLC, our medical malpractice attorneys represent clients in product liability and medical malpractice cases and can help you too.

Call our law firm today at (888) 424-5757 (toll-free phone call) or use the contact form to schedule a free case evaluation.

All sensitive and confidential information you share with our law office remains private through an attorney-client relationship. We accept all cases through contingency fee agreements, meaning that no upfront fees are required until we resolve your legal issue through a negotiated settlement or jury trial verdict.

Resources for a Stryker Hip Lawsuit

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Jonathan Rosenfeld was professionally objective, timely, and knowledgeable. Also, his advice was extremely effective regarding my case. In addition, Jonathan was understanding and patient pertaining to any of my questions or concerns. I was very happy with the end result and I highly recommend Jonathan Rosenfeld. Michonne Proulx
★★★★★
Extremely impressed with this law firm. They took control of a bad motorcycle crash that left my uncle seriously injured. Without any guarantee of a financial recovery, they went out and hired accident investigators and engineers to help prove how the accident happened. I am grateful that they worked on a contingency fee basis as there was no way we could have paid for these services on our own. Ethan Armstrong
★★★★★
This lawyer really helped me get compensation for my motorcycle accident case. I know there is no way that I could have gotten anywhere near the amount that Mr. Rosenfeld was able to get to settle my case. Thank you. Daniel Kaim
★★★★★
Jonathan helped my family heal and get compensation after our child was suffered a life threatening injury at daycare. He was sympathetic and in constant contact with us letting us know all he knew every step of the way. We were so blessed to find Jonathan! Giulia
★★★★★
Jonathan did a great job helping my family navigate through a lengthy lawsuit involving my grandmother's death in a nursing home. Through every step of the case, Jonathan kept my family informed of the progression of the case. Although our case eventually settled at a mediation, I really was impressed at how well prepared Jonathan was to take the case to trial. Lisa