Olson vs. Apac

Introduction:

The plaintiff in this case sought medical attention for a herniated disc. Herniated discs are an incredibly common and complicated injury especially following a workplace or vehicle accident. The doctor’s treatment though apparently aggravated the situation.

Filed: July 15, 2016

Jurisdiction: Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County

Category: Medical Malpractice; Preexisting Injury

Plaintiff: Megan Olson

Defendant(s): Advanced Pain & Anesthesia Consultants PC (APAC); Thomas Pang

Summary:

The issue in this began is distant from the underlying events of the actual lawsuit. The plaintiff, Megan Olson, started seeing Dr. Thomas Pang of APAC for issues related to preexisting injuries. Specifically, she had persistent pain and weaknesses in her lower body from a past herniated disc as well as spinal stenosis. To rectify these problems, Pang provided anesthesia care to Olson at APAC over the course of many months. Unfortunately, rather than solve the problem, it actually made it worse. Olson claimed that the incompetence and medical malpractice of Pang and APAC contributed to her bilateral paraplegia as well as incontinence within the bladder and bowels, among other complications. To recover for these significant injuries and costs, she brought suit against both of them for medical malpractice.

Claims and Damages:

Olson sued Pang and APAC on a theory of medical malpractice. Here are some of the critical elements to his argument:

  • They did not identify that the plaintiff’s circumstances made her more vulnerable to paralysis;
  • They did not identify that the plaintiff’s circumstances made her more vulnerable to bowel/bladder incontinence;
  • They did not properly monitor her stenosis and herniation when she was vulnerable to cauda equina syndrome;
  • They did not refer the plaintiff to neurological staff after failing to relieve her condition;
  • They did not provide the care that the plaintiff was entitled to expect.

Some of Olson’s complications and injuries were already mentioned above, but here were the damages that she complained of in her suit:

  • Past and future medical bills
  • Disfigurement
  • Pain and suffering
  • Loss of normal life

Related Laws:

  • 735 ILCS 5/2-622
  • 740 ILCS 180
  • 750 ILCS 65/15
  • 735 ILCS 5/13-212
  • 735 ILCS 5/2-1116
  • 735 ILCS 5/2-1115
  • 735 ILCS 5/2-1114
  • 735 ILCS 5/2-1205

Expert Insights:

  • The hard factual and legal question of this case will be to draw a line at the preexisting injury (herniated disc) and everything that came after it. The defendant doctor will point to the past while the plaintiff must focus on the doctor’s actions and how that made the situation worse.
  • While cases with preexisting injuries generally fare worse in terms of success and recovery rates than other cases, this suit also involves a very significant injury (paraplegia) so that may balance the prospects out in the plaintiff’s favor.
  • The gist of the plaintiff’s complaint looks at the care that the doctor did but this also does not seem to be far outside the traditional standard of care so she must make an effort to illustrate the egregiousness of his conduct.

Next Up:

For More Information

For more information about , please contact Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers today by calling 888-424-5757. Talk to a lawyer now. Free consultation.

Client Reviews
Jonathan Rosenfeld was professionally objective, timely, and knowledgeable. Also, his advice was extremely effective regarding my case. In addition, Jonathan was understanding and patient pertaining to any of my questions or concerns. I was very happy with the end result and I highly recommend Jonathan Rosenfeld.
★★★★★
Extremely impressed with this law firm. They took control of a bad motorcycle crash that left my uncle seriously injured. Without any guarantee of a financial recovery, they went out and hired accident investigators and engineers to help prove how the accident happened. I am grateful that they worked on a contingency fee basis as there was no way we could have paid for these services on our own. Ethan Armstrong, Google User
★★★★★
This lawyer really helped me get compensation for my motorcycle accident case. I know there is no way that I could have gotten anywhere near the amount that Mr. Rosenfeld was able to get to settle my case. Thank you. Daniel Kaim, Avvo User
★★★★★
Jonathan helped my family heal and get compensation after our child was suffered a life threatening injury at daycare. He was sympathetic and in constant contact with us letting us know all he knew every step of the way. We were so blessed to find Jonathan! Giulia, Avvo User
★★★★★
Jonathan did a great job helping my family navigate through a lengthy lawsuit involving my grandmother's death in a nursing home. Through every step of the case, Jonathan kept my family informed of the progression of the case. Although our case eventually settled at a mediation, I really was impressed at how well prepared Jonathan was to take the case to trial. Lisa, Avvo User
★★★★★
Contact Us for a Free Consultation (888) 424-5757
Chicago Office Map