Articles Posted in Dangerous Drugs & Medical Devices

Talcum Powder and the VerdictsIt seems the media has been abuzz with word that women who have used talcum powder and later developed cancer are owed compensation. Recently, talcum powder has been linked to cancer and lawsuits abound. A talcum powder injury lawyer dealing with a fifty-five million dollar case says that at least one thousand lawsuits are to come for Johnson & Johnson, a huge producer of talcum powder.

Does Talcum Powder Really Cause Cancer?

Talcum powder is mainly made up of talc, a mineral composed of magnesium, silicon, and oxygen. It absorbs moisture and cuts down on friction, making it a useful ingredient for products such as baby powder. Some talc contains asbestos in its natural form. Asbestos is known to cause cancer when inhaled. However, all talcum powder in the United States has been talc-free for more than forty years.

The Risks of Baby PowderThe global leader of consumer personal hygiene products Johnson & Johnson has just suffered one more very costly lawsuit in federal court. In May 2016, for the second time in less than three months, a St. Louis jury awarded a South Dakota woman $55 million after agreeing with the plaintiff that Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder and other talcum-based personal hygiene products directly caused her ovarian cancer. While the connection between cancer and talcum powder might be an unexpected surprise to many consumers, it could be that manufacturers have known of the product’s hidden risks for decades.

A quick dusting of talcum powder is a common use for many of Johnson & Johnson’s talcum base products including Shower to Shower, Baby Powder and others. Many consumers use the products to reduce diaper irritation and rashes in infants and as a quick moisture absorbing solution around adult genital areas. However, these uses might be dangerous.

Recent findings reported by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the American Cancer Society are noting a connection between inhaling significant amounts of the talc powder to chronic and acute lung irritation, naming the condition “talcosis.” Many wise consumers have begun using cornstarch powder as a reliable, safe alternative to avoid direct contact with potentially harmful elements that make up the natural occurring talc mineral including magnesium, silicon and oxygen.

Risks of Baby PowderNo parent would ever consider using a product on the skin of their newborn or infant if the ingredients were considered to be dangerous or hazardous to their health. That is why many of us believe baby powder and other talcum-based products have to be safe to use. After all, these products have been a part of our hygiene maintenance routine forever. If there had ever been problems with talc-based products, we surely would have heard about the problem by now, right?

Sadly, the dangers of baby powder have been known by product manufacturers for decades. However, it likely took the two 2016 verdicts from St. Louis, Missouri jurors awarding plaintiffs more than $127 million because there is a connection between talcum products and ovarian cancer to make consumers aware of the serious problem.

The massive plaintiff financial awards of two successful lawsuits have only recently magnified the life-threatening problem that has been causing serious health issues in women for decades. After much research, there appears to be a connection with women routinely using talcum powder in their genital areas and the development of ovarian cancer.

Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit Lost by Johnson & JohnsonIn May 2016, a St. Louis Missouri jury ordered consumer product, pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson (J & J) to pay $55 million over a claim that talcum powder sold under the company name caused ovarian cancer. Jurors deliberated more than eight hours before agreeing with a South Dakota female plaintiff that her ovarian cancer was caused by years of using talcum powder that was sold under the J & J brand and others. The New Jersey-based consumer product giant announced it will appeal the ruling.

This is the second time in less than three months that Johnson & Johnson has been ordered to pay plaintiffs a huge award by a St. Louis jury to cover claims that its product causes cancer. In February 2016, jurors awarded more than $72 million to a 62-year-old Alabama woman’s surviving family members, who has since passed away in October 2015 from ovarian cancer. Both cases involved evidence that using Johnson & Johnson talcum products including baby powder caused cancer.

The Latest Ruling

Warnings on Birth Control DeviceWomen looking for a simple alternative to traditional methods of sterilization have turned to the Essure Permanent Birth Control System, which is marketed and sold by Bayer. The contraceptive device was originally developed by Conceptus Inc. and approved in 2002. Bayer purchased Conceptus and the rights to the Essure System in 2013 and is now under fire for numerous complications that women using the system have suffered. These complications are so severe that the FDA has implemented a black box warning for the devices— which requires patients to sign a waiver stating that they have been notified of the risks associated with the devices prior to use.

How the Essure System Works

The Essure Permanent Birth Control System is a non-hormonal birth control method that prevents pregnancy through sterilization. Two flexible coils are inserted into the fallopian and over time, scar tissue develops around the coils and causes permanent infertility by creating a barrier that prevents eggs from reaching the uterus. The simple outpatient procedure has made the system an attractive alternative to tubal litigation and the devices can be inserted without any need for anesthesia.

Concerns arise about Invokana and OsteoporosisAt the time of FDA approval for Invokana (canagliflozin) in 2013, the benefits versus risks of the prescription medication to treat diabetes had already become highly questionable. Within the first two years of availability in the United States, serious concerns over the drug turned to reality when clinical studies showed users were experiencing reduced bone density in their hips and lower spine.

Invokana is a glifozin class drug that is prescribed by family doctors to treat Type II diabetes. Developed and manufactured by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, the prescription medication is marketed by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson. The oral diabetes prescription medication has shown to be highly effective in controlling blood sugar levels by assisting the kidneys in ridding the body of glucose in the bloodstream. The drug marketers claim that with exercise and diet, Invokana can be highly effective at treating and controlling diabetes.

Even before the prescription medication had become available in the United States, the pharmaceutical manufacturer and marketers had already become aware that the drug posed serious problems, even during short-term use. Before its approval in the U.S., many patients in other countries that already suffered serious kidney damage or become victims of heart attacks and ketoacidosis. In some cases, patients were suffering bone fractures in less than 90 days after first taking the drug. The risk of fractures and bone loss seem to be most prominent in women of post-menopausal age.

Xarelto and its' LawsuitsPrescription drug marketer Janssen Pharmaceuticals has begun a full press marketing blitz to promote a leading blood thinning medication Xarelto (riboroxaban) by using familiar celebrities. The promotional campaign commercials involve golfer Arnold Palmer, professional racer Brian Vickers, Chris Bosh from the Miami Heat and comedian/actor Kevin Neely. The celebrities have all taken the prescription medication for a variety of conditions that require treatment for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), atrial fibrillation, pulmonary embolism and blood clots.

Xarelto is a leading anti-coagulation (blood thinner) prescription medication manufactured by Bayer Pharmaceuticals. The drug is promoted to reduce the potential risk of blood clots and stroke in individuals suffering from atrial fibrillation that is not associated with heart valve problems. In addition, the FDA has approved Xarelto to treat pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, and help reduce the potential recurrence of these conditions.

The drug has also received approval as a treatment to reduce the potential risk of forming blood clots in the lungs and legs of individuals who have recently undergone hip or knee replacement surgery. Despite its widespread use, the drug has caused many patients to suffer with serious adverse side effects.

Serious Side Effects

There are significant health issues associated with taking Xarelto that have the potential of claiming the lives of unsuspecting patients who were not properly warned against its dangers. The anti-coagulant has serious side effects that cause hemorrhaging, embolism, blood clots, internal bleeding and death due to uncontrollable bleeding. This is not the first time that manufacturers and marketers have been sued for failing to warn consumers or inform doctors on the adverse effects of a bad drug that causes internal or uncontrolled bleeding.

Xarelto has been known to increase bleeding in patients who have undergone hip surgery, are acutely ill and require blood thinners to minimize the potential of developing blood clots, or those suffering from ACS (acute coronary syndrome). Patients suffering many of the adverse side effects caused by Xarelto often face extensive hospitalization, enormous medical expenses and considerable time away from work. In some cases, patients have died due to uncontrollable internal bleeding.

Many victims and surviving family members have filed personal injury claims and wrongful death lawsuits in an effort to obtain financial compensation for their damages. By taking action, the victims can hold the marketer and manufacturer liable for making and selling a dangerous drug.

Building a Case for Compensation

Every case involving adverse side effects caused by Xarelto are unique. Even so, many victims of the dangerous drug are eligible to participate in personal injury lawsuits and class-action suits taken against Bayer and Jensen Pharmaceutical companies. However, building a strong case for compensation is complex. Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers have handled many cases against bad drug manufacturers and marketers, including those that produce and promote Xarelto. These cases have been built on legal liability strategies that involved:

  • Failure to provide adequate warning and misleading the public about the drug’s potential risk of causing uncontrollable bleeding.
  • Failure to inform patients that no antidote is available to reverse blood thinning of Faxon hemorrhaging caused by the prescription medication.
  • Showing a direct connection between the death of a loved one and the use of Xarelto that caused the victim to bleed to death.

Hiring an Attorney

Even though the drug has only been available in the United States since 2011, nearly 2000 lawsuits have already been filed by victims suffering injuries from the medication or their surviving family members. Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers offer aggressive, swift legal recourse to hold Bayer and Janssen Pharmaceuticals legally liable for making and promoting the unsafe product. Our team of lawyers demand complete justice for our clients and have ample resources to take on the drug industry.

Our law firm provides compassionate legal counsel through successful negotiation skills and trial advocacy. With years of seasoned experience, we aggressively fight on your behalf against the major drug manufacturers that have caused such profound loss for you and your family. We encourage you to call our law offices today at (888) 424-5757 to schedule a no obligation, free initial consultation. Our team of attorneys will evaluate your case and provide numerous legal options to recover your financial damages so you can heal from your injuries.

Faults with Bair Hugger Warming Blankets3M Bair Hugger manufactures and sells a forced air warming blankets that are used during implant surgeries nationwide. The blanket helps patients who are under anesthesia regulate their body temperature while it prevents hypothermia. Using a surgical hose, the system forces hot air into the disposable blanket draped over the patient’s larger body areas during surgery. The warming blanket has been used by many surgeons during millions of surgical procedures each year as a way to reduce the chance of hypothermia, when the patient loses body heat at a rate faster than it can be produced.

While designed to reduce the potential risks of developing an infection, the device might actually cause an infection by blowing highly contaminated bacteria-laden air from the tainted floor area into the patient’s opened surgical site. The potential risk of developing an infection is especially severe for individuals undergoing artificial heart valve implant surgery or joint replacement surgeries including knee and hip replacements.

The Inventor Speaks Out

Bair Hugger Infections post surgeryMany patients have developed serious life-threatening infections after hip and knee replacement surgeries from using temperature management systems developed and sold by 3M Bair Hugger. Many of these individuals have filed lawsuits against the manufacturer of the device claiming negligence of its potential risks and safety hazards.

These warming devices are used during surgical procedures as a way to regulate body temperature. Currently, more than 50,000 warming systems sold by the device manufacturer are used in nationwide hospitals and have warmed millions of patients since the products were first brought to the medical marketplace.

Many personal injury attorneys, including Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, have claimed that the forced air warming blankets have design defects that cause a disruption of laminar flow during surgeries in operating rooms nationwide. The defects allow bacteria and other dangerous contaminants to transfer from the floor and enter the patient’s surgical site. The defect increases the potential risks of knee and hip implant patients to develop a life-threatening joint infection after surgery.

Uncontrollable Bleeding Caused by XareltoIn 2011, the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved the blood thinner Xarelto (rivaroxaban) for prescription as an effective anticoagulant. The prescription medication is manufactured by Bayer and marketed in the United States by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.

Almost immediately, many patients suffered its dangerous side effects including uncontrolled bleeding. While bleeding is not uncommon when taking anticoagulants, many personal injury attorneys, including Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, allege that Xarelto is significantly more dangerous compared to other blood thinners because it lacks an antidote for reversing many of the effects of blood thinning.

That means during emergent situations, the individual might be at risk for a life-threatening irreversible bleeding issue including gastrointestinal or internal hemorrhaging. As a result, many patients prescribed the drug have filed lawsuits against the manufacturer and marketer on the grounds that they did not receive adequate warning against the dangers of using the blood thinning medication.

Client Reviews

  • Jonathan Rosenfeld was professionally objective, timely, and knowledgeable. Also, his advice was extremely effective regarding my case. In addition, Jonathan was understanding and patient pertaining to any of my questions or concerns. I was very happy with the end result and I highly recommend Jonathan Rosenfeld.
    ★★★★★
  • Extremely impressed with this law firm. They took control of a bad motorcycle crash that left my uncle seriously injured. Without any guarantee of a financial recovery, they went out and hired accident investigators and engineers to help prove how the accident happened. I am grateful that they worked on a contingency fee basis as there was no way we could have paid for these services on our own.
    ★★★★★
  • This lawyer really helped me get compensation for my motorcycle accident case. I know there is no way that I could have gotten anywhere near the amount that Mr. Rosenfeld was able to get to settle my case. Thank you.
    ★★★★★
  • Jonathan helped my family heal and get compensation after our child was suffered a life threatening injury at daycare. He was sympathetic and in constant contact with us letting us know all he knew every step of the way. We were so blessed to find Jonathan!
    ★★★★★
  • Jonathan did a great job helping my family navigate through a lengthy lawsuit involving my grandmother's death in a nursing home. Through every step of the case, Jonathan kept my family informed of the progression of the case. Although our case eventually settled at a mediation, I really was impressed at how well prepared Jonathan was to take the case to trial.
    ★★★★★