Levin vs. Kaplan

Introduction:

Many people make mistakes on the job. However, when you are a doctor, your carelessness can have harmful and expensive consequences. This case involved a simple matter of a swapped prescription but resulted in great pain to the plaintiff and, hence, a lawsuit.

Filed: June 10, 2016

Jurisdiction: Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County

Category: Medical Malpractice

Plaintiff: Robert Levin

Defendant(s): Abe Kaplan, M.D., Eye Physicians, S.C., and John/Jane Doe

Summary:

In this case, recently filed in Cook County, Robert Levin is seeking damages from his doctor, Abe Kaplan, and the doctor’s employer. In June of 2014, Levin sought the services of Kaplan because he needed an eye doctor and the latter specialized in ophthalmology. Unfortunately, the kind of care that Levin received was not what he was expecting, at least according to him. Apparently, Kaplan implanted the wrong intraocular acrylic lens onto Levin’s eye. In fact, it was meant for another patient. In his complaint, Levin goes on to say that the incorrect implantation caused him great pain, increased dizziness, and significant pain. He sued the doctor and the doctor’s employer for the injury and the ensuing damages including the follow-up surgery that was required to fix the original procedure.

Claims and Damages:

As mentioned above, Levin sued his eye doctor for malpractice as well as the related company, Eye Physicians, S.C. Here are the grounds which constitute his case: First, Dr. Kaplan negligently and carelessly implanted an intraocular acrylic lens intended for a different patient into Levin's right eye; second, he failed to verify the patient information on the intraocular acrylic lens before implanting it into Levin's right eye; third, he failed to supervise other persons who assisted in the surgical procedure, including some of his unknown employees.

According to his complaints, these errors legally and factually caused his injuries and damages. Further down in his suit, Levin alleges much of the same claims against Kaplan’s employer except he also adds that Levin did these things within his scope of employment thereby opening up the company to liability.

Due to this botched operation, Levin claimed the following damages:

  • Past and future medical bills including a subsequent operation to fix the original surgery.
  • Personal injuries and discomfort due to the improper fitting lens.

Related Laws:

  • 735 ILCS 5/2-622
  • 740 ILCS 180
  • 750 ILCS 65/15
  • 735 ILCS 5/13-212
  • 735 ILCS 5/2-1116
  • 735 ILCS 5/2-1115
  • 735 ILCS 5/2-1114
  • 735 ILCS 5/2-1205

Expert Insights:

  • The conundrum of this case might be to exhibit that the misplaced prescription actually caused significant damage, short-term or long-term. While the event did require a corrective surgery, that damage is easily quantifiable and the plaintiff might do well to memorialize how the accident seriously affected him.
  • The plaintiff might want to investigate the exact differences between the lens that was used and the lens that should have been used. Understanding this deviation will help him delineate just how far outside the standard of care that the doctor went. On the other hand, if the difference is minor, the doctor might offer that this was only a minor breach merely warranting a repayment of the medical expenses that it cost the plaintiff to redo the procedure.

Next Up:

For More Information

For more information about , please contact Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers today by calling 888-424-5757. Talk to a lawyer now. Free consultation.

Client Reviews
Jonathan Rosenfeld was professionally objective, timely, and knowledgeable. Also, his advice was extremely effective regarding my case. In addition, Jonathan was understanding and patient pertaining to any of my questions or concerns. I was very happy with the end result and I highly recommend Jonathan Rosenfeld.
★★★★★
Extremely impressed with this law firm. They took control of a bad motorcycle crash that left my uncle seriously injured. Without any guarantee of a financial recovery, they went out and hired accident investigators and engineers to help prove how the accident happened. I am grateful that they worked on a contingency fee basis as there was no way we could have paid for these services on our own.
★★★★★
This lawyer really helped me get compensation for my motorcycle accident case. I know there is no way that I could have gotten anywhere near the amount that Mr. Rosenfeld was able to get to settle my case. Thank you.
★★★★★
Jonathan helped my family heal and get compensation after our child was suffered a life threatening injury at daycare. He was sympathetic and in constant contact with us letting us know all he knew every step of the way. We were so blessed to find Jonathan!
★★★★★
Jonathan did a great job helping my family navigate through a lengthy lawsuit involving my grandmother's death in a nursing home. Through every step of the case, Jonathan kept my family informed of the progression of the case. Although our case eventually settled at a mediation, I really was impressed at how well prepared Jonathan was to take the case to trial.
★★★★★
Contact Us for a Free Consultation (888) 424-5757
Chicago Office Map