Interrogatories 2 plaintiffs 213f interrogatories and 214 requests to produce in products liability case

Download PDF Version


Plaintiff's Rule 213(f) Interrogatories and Rule 214 Request to Produce to Defendants

Robert A. Clifford, Attorney for Plaintiff, Kevin P. Durkin, Richard F. Burke, Jr., Shannon M. McNulty, Colin H. Dunn, Clifford Law Offices, P.C., 120 N. Lasalle Street, 31st Floor, Chicago Illinois 60602, (312) 899-9090, Atty. No.: 32640.

Plaintiff JENNIFER E. GARLAND, Independent Administrator of the Estate of SCOTT A. GARLAND, Deceased, through her attorneys, CLIFFORD LAW OFFICES, P.C., pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 213, propounds the following Interrogatories to the Defendants, TELEDYNE INDUSTRIES, INC., TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TDY INDUSTRIES, INC., T.W. SMITH ENGINE CO., INC., SYBARIS CLUBS INTERNATIONAL, INC., SYBARIS VENTURES ONE, LLC, H.K. GOLDEN EAGLE, INC., RANDELL D. REPKE, Independent Executor of the Estate of KENNETH C. KNUDSON, GALT AIRPORT, L.L.C., MORGAN STANLEY & CO., INC., and DONNA TUREK, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of MARK TUREK, to be answered within twenty-eight (28) days:

1. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 213(f)(1), identify any and all “lay witnesses” who will testify at trial on behalf of the Defendant. As to each witness state:

a. The identity and address of the witness.

b. The subjects on which the witness will testify.

ANSWER:

2. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 213 (f(2), identify any and all “independent expert witnesses” who will testify at trial on behalf of the Defendant. As to each witness, state:

a. The identity and address of the witness.

b. The subjects on which the witness will testify.

c. The opinions Defendant expect to elicit from the witness.

d. If known, the bases for each opinion and the facts the witness believes supports each opinion.

e. State the date or approximate date on which the conclusions and opinions identified in (c) were first expressed or made known to you.

ANSWER:

3. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 213(f)(3), identify any and all “controlled expert witnesses” who will testify at time of trial on behalf of the Defendant. As to each witness, state the following:

a. Identity and address.

b. Area(s) of expertise.

c. The subject matter on which the witness will testify.

d. The conclusions and opinions of the witness and the bases therefore.

e. The qualifications for each witness and attach a curriculum vitae pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 214.

f. Identify each and every report prepared by each expert or opinion witness identified above, indicating whether this report was submitted in oral form, written form, or both, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 213(f)(3), and provide a complete copy of the expert witness' report, if in written form, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 214.

g. Identify, with particularity any and all statements, reports, letters, medical records (including x-rays), tape recordings, photographs, memoranda, or documentation of any type reviewed by each person and the date on which these materials were provided to the witness.

h. State the name, author, publisher, page and date of publishing of all texts, articles, journals or medical literature upon which any witness relied, consulted in connection with review of this matter, or may use or refer to at trial, or which Defendants otherwise intend to use at trial.

i. State the date or approximate date on which the conclusions and opinions identified in (d) were first expressed or made known to you.

j. State with particularity all other information verbally furnished to each witness for consideration.

ANSWER:

4. Identify (and, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 214, produce legible copies of) all correspondence or other written communication between each witness and Defendant's counsel or anyone acting on Defendant's behalf in regard to this action.

ANSWER:

5. Did any witness(es) identified in the Answers to Interrogatory Nos. 1, 2, and/or 3, at any time, prepare any notes, memoranda, summaries or other writings in connection with this matter? If so, (a) identify each such writing; and (b) pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 214, produce legible copies of all such wrings

ANSWER:

Client Reviews
Jonathan Rosenfeld was professionally objective, timely, and knowledgeable. Also, his advice was extremely effective regarding my case. In addition, Jonathan was understanding and patient pertaining to any of my questions or concerns. I was very happy with the end result and I highly recommend Jonathan Rosenfeld.
★★★★★
Extremely impressed with this law firm. They took control of a bad motorcycle crash that left my uncle seriously injured. Without any guarantee of a financial recovery, they went out and hired accident investigators and engineers to help prove how the accident happened. I am grateful that they worked on a contingency fee basis as there was no way we could have paid for these services on our own. Ethan Armstrong, Google User
★★★★★
This lawyer really helped me get compensation for my motorcycle accident case. I know there is no way that I could have gotten anywhere near the amount that Mr. Rosenfeld was able to get to settle my case. Thank you. Daniel Kaim, Avvo User
★★★★★
Jonathan helped my family heal and get compensation after our child was suffered a life threatening injury at daycare. He was sympathetic and in constant contact with us letting us know all he knew every step of the way. We were so blessed to find Jonathan! Giulia, Avvo User
★★★★★
Jonathan did a great job helping my family navigate through a lengthy lawsuit involving my grandmother's death in a nursing home. Through every step of the case, Jonathan kept my family informed of the progression of the case. Although our case eventually settled at a mediation, I really was impressed at how well prepared Jonathan was to take the case to trial. Lisa, Avvo User
★★★★★
Contact Us for a Free Consultation (888) 424-5757
Chicago Office Map