Coronavirus Update: To New & Existing Clients Learn More ›

Super Lawyers
Illinois State Bar Association
Justia Lawyer Rating
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Avvo Rating
BBB Accredited Business

Illinois Neck Injury Car Accident Settlements

Overview and Statistics

Awards Settlements Personal Injury Neck InjuriesThe different facets and dimensions of the law surrounding automobile accidents are important and interesting, but a client’s paramount consideration is how much they can financially recover from a lawsuit. This is the whole reason for initiating a lawsuit. “How much is my car accident worth?” is a question that has been asked by nearly every victim our law firm has worked with over the years. Especially with neck injuries, the total cost that car accidents impose is steep. Therefore, below is detailed information of what others were able to achieve across Illinois over the last 20 years.

Illinois Plaintiffs' Recovery in Car Accidents Involving Neck Injuies (1994-2014)

Amount Recovered
Percentage of Cases

County Breakdown

Below is a table that breaks down all Illinois car accident cases where a neck injury was the main or significant harm by county and award or settlement size. The number represents the percentage of cases and associated award or settlement listed in each county. As an example, 8.44% of Illinois neck cases were in Cook County and had no recovery. Only the most litigious counties were included.

Here are some major takeaways from accident cases involving neck injuries around Illinois:

  • 18% more Illinois plaintiffs received more than $50,000 compared to other cases around the country.
  • 8% more Illinois plaintiffs received more than $1,000,000 compared to other cases around the country.
  • The most common Illinois counties for neck injury litigation in car accidents included Cook, Kane, Lake, DuPage, Madison, Will, Winnebago, and St. Clair.
  • The median range of recovery was between $25,000 and $50,000.

Case Summaries and Highlights

Below are sample case summaries detailing why some plaintiffs were more successful than others in obtaining monetary recovery:





This case centered on two accidents and two defendants. In the first, the first defendant made a U-turn into the plaintiff’s lane and broadsided her vehicle. In the second, the defendant’s truck rear-ended her car. The combined effect of both crashes left her with serious eye and neck injuries. She sued both drivers, claiming that both incidents led to these problems. Interestingly, the jury found that both defendants were responsible for all of her injuries. This is a common outcome that might occur because the justice system is concerned that plaintiffs should receive a financial recovery, regardless of which wrongful-defendant ends up paying. In this case, after the first defendant settled with the plaintiff, the judge ruled that the second defendant only had to pay the remaining 50% of the award. Therefore, the plaintiff only ended up receiving $409,000 of the $518,000 jury award.





The plaintiff in this case was a passenger in a van with three other people. The defendant was travelling behind the vehicle in his car but failed to slow down and rear-ended their van. The force of the crash pushed the van into the median divider and then into a pole before finally coming to a stop. The plaintiff experienced serious neck injuries due to the incident that later developed into a chronic pain condition. Also, he suffered lacerations all over his body and injuries to his feet. The other three passengers in the van settled privately with the defendant but the plaintiff eventually sued because his injuries proved to be more complicated. At trial, it was discovered that the defendant was intoxicated at the time of the crash. However, this did not stop him from claiming the plaintiff was exaggerating the extent of his injuries. The defendant did not offer any expert testimony that the court found acceptable to substantiate this claim. Therefore, left with only the expert proof offered by the plaintiff, the jury found for him in the following manner:

  • Past and Future Pain and Suffering:
  • Loss of Normal Life:
  • Disfigurement:
  • Medical Costs:
  • Punitive Damages:
  • Total:
  • $300,000
  • $400,000
  • $50,500
  • $125,000
  • $100,000
  • $975,000



RECOVERY: $1,570,000


The female plaintiff in this case was a cop who at the time of the incident was directing traffic. The defendant was passing by and sideswiped her with his mirror. The force threw the officer down to the ground causing significant neck, facial, and brain injuries. She claimed she had a concussion, extensive lacerations, and would also experience long-term impairments of memory and concentration, and a dimished quality of life. Also, the plaintiff said she would be unable to return to work as a consequence of the accident. The defendant refuted her inability to continue working as well as the overall extent of her injuries. However, we do not know on what grounds he would have made these counterarguments because both sides settled prior to trial for $1,570,000.

250M + Recovered for Our Clients
No Fee Guarantee We Never Charge a Fee Unless We Win
Available 24/7 Available 24-Hours per Day When You Need Us
Client Reviews
Jonathan Rosenfeld was professionally objective, timely, and knowledgeable. Also, his advice was extremely effective regarding my case. In addition, Jonathan was understanding and patient pertaining to any of my questions or concerns. I was very happy with the end result and I highly recommend Jonathan Rosenfeld. Michonne Proulx
Extremely impressed with this law firm. They took control of a bad motorcycle crash that left my uncle seriously injured. Without any guarantee of a financial recovery, they went out and hired accident investigators and engineers to help prove how the accident happened. I am grateful that they worked on a contingency fee basis as there was no way we could have paid for these services on our own. Ethan Armstrong
This lawyer really helped me get compensation for my motorcycle accident case. I know there is no way that I could have gotten anywhere near the amount that Mr. Rosenfeld was able to get to settle my case. Thank you. Daniel Kaim
Jonathan helped my family heal and get compensation after our child was suffered a life threatening injury at daycare. He was sympathetic and in constant contact with us letting us know all he knew every step of the way. We were so blessed to find Jonathan! Giulia
Jonathan did a great job helping my family navigate through a lengthy lawsuit involving my grandmother's death in a nursing home. Through every step of the case, Jonathan kept my family informed of the progression of the case. Although our case eventually settled at a mediation, I really was impressed at how well prepared Jonathan was to take the case to trial. Lisa