photo__2408910_rosenfeld

Legally Reviewed by:

Jonathan Rosenfeld
J.D

January 17, 2024

Over $400 Million worth of case results

Awarded The Best Lawyer in 2024 by U.S. News

Nationally Recognized in Legal Community

Defective hair relaxers represent a substantial consumer safety concern, often leading to significant adverse health effects and debilitating injuries. The attorneys at Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, LLC are well-versed in the legal intricacies of product liability, dedicating their efforts to protect and represent affected individuals. We work tirelessly to ensure that responsible parties are held accountable, and our clients receive the justice they deserve.

HAIR RELAXER 01 01

Understanding the Gravity of Hair Relaxer Lawsuits

The increasing number of hair relaxer lawsuits reflects a growing concern over the safety of hair relaxer products. Often marketed as a straightforward path to straight, manageable hair, chemical hair relaxers have become a staple in beauty routines.

Yet, beneath the surface of these seemingly benign products lies a potential link to grave health risks, including uterine cancer, which is now the subject of intense legal scrutiny. Women across the nation, many of whom have used these hair relaxer products for years, are now facing the distressing possibility that their health issues may be attributable to the chemicals they trusted.

The gravity of these lawsuits is rooted in the health repercussions for individual users and the broader implications for consumer safety and corporate accountability. As legal battles like the hair relaxer cancer lawsuit unfold, they bring to light critical questions about industry regulations, the duty to warn consumers, and the ethical responsibilities of hair relaxer manufacturers.

The Chemical Hair Relaxers Issue and Its Impact on Women’s Health

Chemical hair relaxers have been linked to severe health concerns, particularly among women who are frequent users of these products. Reports and studies suggest a correlation between long-term use and an increased risk of developing reproductive health issues, such as uterine fibroids and various forms of cancer, including uterine and ovarian cancer.

The health impact is deeply concerning, as it predominantly affects African-American women, who are statistically more likely to use these hair-relaxing products.

Hair Relaxer cancer Lawsuit have been filed by women who have developed cancer and fibroids after using the product.

A surge in hair relaxer lawsuits has been observed in response to these alarming health concerns. Victims are coming forward to file claims, seeking accountability from producers of these chemical hair relaxers.

With each new hair relaxer lawsuit filed, the issue gains more attention, pressuring the industry to reconsider the safety of their hair straightening products and the transparency of their ingredient disclosure.

Why Do People File Hair Relaxer Lawsuits?

According to recent research, hair relaxers may be linked to an increased risk of developing various cancers due to prolonged exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). These include phthalates, parabens, alkylphenols, cyclosiloxanes, and ethanolamines.

Chemical relaxers contain EDCs, which can negatively impact the delicate hormone balance in our bodies. A 2021 study in the Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology found that several of these chemicals are hormonally active, including boosting estrogen production and reducing the production of androgens.

Elevated estrogen is a known risk factor for a number of reproductive cancers and conditions, including ovarian and uterine cancers.

It’s unclear how EDCs disrupt hormone balances, but researchers have proposed several theories regarding the issue. Some of these possibilities include the following:

  • EDCs artificially tamp down the production of hormones in the endocrine system, thus making them less available.
  • They mimic a hormone, which causes the endocrine system to believe it has overproduced hormones and slows its production.
  • The chemical counteracts hormone activity, essentially keeping the hormones from doing their job.
  • They speed up the hormones’ metabolism to break down faster, forcing the endocrine system to produce more, which could lead to excessive stress on the body.
  • Endocrine disrupters block hormones from reaching their receptors, meaning the body cannot use them.

Prolonged usage of specific chemical relaxer products has been found to have up to a 10-fold increase in the risk of developing various types of cancer, which is a solid foundation for many to file a hair relaxer cancer civil suit.

What Brands Are Under Investigation in Hair Relaxer Product Lawsuits?

Some of the manufacturers and products that are involved in most hair relaxer lawsuits include:

  • L’Oreal – manufacturer of Dark & Lovely, Ultra Sheen, and other chemical hair products
  • Namaste, LLC – manufacturer of ORS Olive Oil Hair Relaxer
  • TCB Naturals/Godrej Consumer Products – manufacturer of Just For Me
  • Strength of Nature Global, LLC – manufacturer of Motions
Formaldehyde in Hair Relaxers

The Science Behind Hair Relaxer Products and Associated Health Risks

Understanding the science behind hair relaxers is critical in comprehending the associated health risks. Hair relaxer products typically contain a cocktail of chemicals designed to permanently alter the hair shaft’s structure. Still, these same chemicals have raised concerns over their potential as endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

The implications of these findings are significant, as they form the foundation of the chemical hair relaxer lawsuits that allege a direct cause-and-effect relationship between product use and the development of severe health conditions.

Composition of Hair Relaxer Products: Chemicals and Endocrine Disruptors

Chemical hair relaxers contain potent ingredients that break down the hair’s natural bonds to achieve straightening effects. Among these are certain harmful chemicals, like phthalates and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), which are under scrutiny for their health implications.

These substances can interfere with the body’s hormonal systems and are being investigated for their role in the development of uterine cancer and other serious health issues.

Several epidemiological studies have examined the potential link between the use of hair relaxer products and an increased risk of uterine and ovarian cancer. While research is ongoing, preliminary findings have added weight to the allegations in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits, suggesting that the long-term use of these products may be a contributing factor to cancer development.

These studies are a cornerstone in the ongoing hair relaxer lawsuits, providing the scientific backing needed for legal claims.

Elevated Risks for African-Americans: A Closer Look at the Data

Research conducted by the National Cancer Institute highlights a heightened risk for uterine cancer among African-American females, attributed primarily to the use of hair relaxers containing endocrine-disrupting chemicals. This demographic is particularly vulnerable to uterine fibroids, which not only predispose them to developing uterine cancer at an earlier age but also pose a risk of permanent infertility. The prevalent use of permanent hair relaxers, loaded with endocrine-disrupting agents, has been identified as a significant risk factor.

The findings of the National Institutes of Health study further reinforce this concern. The study reveals that African-American females who regularly use hair relaxers face a higher probability of developing uterine cancer [1], alongside other severe health consequences, compared to those who abstain from these products. These alarming statistics also point to broader health impacts, including a marked decrease in fertility rates and increased instances of permanent infertility among this population group.

Integrating these findings into the broader context of hair relaxer safety and legal accountability underscores the critical need for ongoing research and informed consumer awareness, particularly within communities disproportionately affected by these health risks.

The hair straightener/relaxer litigation landscape rapidly evolves as new cases emerge and existing ones progress through the legal system. Central to these developments is forming a hair chemical relaxer MDL (multidistrict litigation), consolidating numerous lawsuits to streamline the pretrial proceedings. As new hair relaxer lawsuits join the MDL, the collective evidence and legal arguments presented will shape the trajectory of these cases.

Emergence of New Hair Relaxer Product Lawsuits

Recent years have seen a notable surge in litigation regarding hair relaxer products. These lawsuits primarily allege that specific hair relaxer brands contain harmful chemicals, potentially leading to severe health consequences such as ovarian and uterine cancers.

Consolidation into a Class Action: A Possibility

While individual cases are mounting, there remains a possibility for these to be amalgamated into a class action lawsuit. This would imply that a collective of plaintiffs, having suffered comparable injuries from the same product, seek legal redress together. No class action lawsuit concerning hair relaxers has been initiated in federal court.

Pending Litigation Against Manufacturers

Despite the absence of a class action lawsuit, multiple cases are currently in progress against various hair relaxer manufacturers. These lawsuits center on the accusation that manufacturers failed to provide sufficient warnings to consumers about the heightened risk of uterine cancer associated with the use of their hair-relaxing products. This litigation trend underscores the growing concern over consumer safety and the accountability of manufacturers in the beauty industry.

Hair Relaxer Class Action/MDL Lawsuit Updates

The class action hair relaxer lawsuit represents a group of plaintiffs who allege similar harm caused by chemical hair relaxers. Recent updates in these cases have seen an increase in the number of women joining the class action, all seeking justice and compensation for their alleged injuries. These updates are crucial, as they influence the direction and momentum of the litigation process.

Hair Relaxer Class Action vs. Hair Relaxer MDL (Multidistrict Litigation)

Emerging from the shadows of individual grievances, the new hair relaxer lawsuits represent a consolidated effort against the alleged harm caused by hair relaxers. In 2017, a significant hair relaxer lawsuit filed in federal court set in motion a series of legal challenges aimed squarely at cosmetic giants. The litigation accuses these corporations of selling hair straightening products that are purported to cause ovarian and uterine cancer.

In a decisive move, multiple hair relaxer lawsuits against a single manufacturer or its affiliates were amalgamated into multidistrict litigation (MDL). This strategic consolidation occurred in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, marking a pivotal junction for the defendants. The MDL [2], distinct from a class action, is a procedural device designed to streamline the complex process involving numerous plaintiffs who developed uterine cancer or similar ailments after using chemical hair straightening products.

This new hair relaxer lawsuit process amalgamates similar claims into one overarching case, enhancing the efficiency of legal discovery, expert witness selection, and other pivotal aspects of the litigation. For the plaintiffs, many of whom are black women who have developed cancer, this hair relaxer MDL stands as a beacon of hope, simplifying the pursuit of just compensation for the toll exacted by these chemical hair relaxer products.

Those who have been diagnosed with uterine cancer following the use of these products are urged to consider filing an individual claim or joining the existing MDL in the Northern District of Illinois. With the guidance of an adept attorney, the intricate uterine cancer lawsuit process is navigated, safeguarding the rights of the afflicted.

A lawyer specializing in hair straightener lawsuits commits to the battle for rightful compensation covering medical bills, lost income, and the anguish endured due to illnesses linked to chemically activated hair straighteners.

The legal landscape is ever-shifting, with more hair relaxer lawsuits being filed and potential hair relaxer settlements taking shape. As the number of hair relaxer plaintiffs grows, the call for accountability echoes louder, with each hair relaxer case reinforcing the collective voice demanding redress.

Procedural Aspects of Filing Hair Relaxer Product Lawsuits

Navigating the legalities of filing a hair relaxer lawsuit requires understanding the various procedural steps involved. Each stage is pivotal in building a solid case, from submitting initial claims to managing short-form complaints. The procedures are detailed and require the guidance of experienced product liability lawyersto ensure that all legal criteria are met and that the case is effectively presented.

November 13, 2023 – Advancement in Hair Straightener/Relaxer Litigation

A federal judge has permitted most of the claims against L’Oreal USA, Revlon, and other companies involved in the hair straightener/relaxer litigation to proceed. This marks a critical step forward in the case.

November 1st, 2023 – Plaintiff’s Steering Committee Motion

The Plaintiff’s Steering Committee in the hair relaxer lawsuit has proposed an 11% set aside from any total settlement or judgment. This would be split as 8% for work benefiting all parties and 3% for covering standard benefit costs, with the motion receiving unanimous support within the committee.

October 16, 2023 – Surge in Hair Relaxing MDL Cases

The class action litigation surrounding hair relaxers has significantly increased, with 3,752 new lawsuits being added to the multi-district litigation (MDL) in the last month alone. This influx brings the total number of pending lawsuits in the MDL to 5,996.

October 4, 2023 – Update on Case Management

Judge Mary M. Rowland issued an update to the Case Management Order for the Hair Relaxer Lawsuit, specifying, among other procedural details, that plaintiffs must use the short form complaint (SFC).

August 2023 – Master Complaint Filed in MDL

A master complaint was filed to consolidate common legal and factual claims among the plaintiffs in the multi-district litigation class action. This action aims to centralize key allegations and guide pretrial discovery, although it does not merge individual lawsuits.

July 2023 – Ongoing MDL Cases

The class action multi-district litigation (MDL) regarding hair relaxers and their link to various types of cancer had 236 active cases as of this month.

June 1, 2023 – Unveiling the Connection Between Hair Relaxers and Fertility

Research conducted by the Boston University School of Public Health underscored a worrying link between chemical hair straighteners and decreased fertility rates.

The American Journal of Epidemiology featured the study, highlighting a racial disparity wherein Black, Hispanic, and mixed-race individuals were identified as frequent users of these products, thus exposing them to potential harm.

The investigation shed light on the prolonged and early usage of hair relaxers within these groups and its correlation with a decrease in the chances of pregnancy.

Not surprisingly, a sister study resonates with existing evidence on the health hazards associated with exposure to toxic beauty product chemicals such as phthalates, phenols, and parabens.

May 23, 2023 – Progress in Hair Relaxer Lawsuits: The Master Complaint

The plaintiffs in the ongoing hair relaxer lawsuits submitted a Master Complaint in federal court, a consolidated document encapsulating common allegations across multiple individual lawsuits against a shared defendant group.

After this submission, each plaintiff will file a complaint referencing the Master Complaint and detailing their special allegations and damages.

This legal action primarily represents women who developed uterine and ovarian cancers, among other conditions, due to exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in hair straighteners.

May 19, 2023 – Court Hearing Addresses Discovery Disputes

Yesterday, a telephonic hearing aimed to resolve disputes regarding the discovery process. Although the court favored the defendants, the disputed issues were relatively minor.

May 15, 2023 – Expansion of the MDL: More Hair Relaxer Lawsuits

The class action MDL welcomed 22 new plaintiffs last month, elevating the number of pending cases to 124.

When the MDL was established in February, there were just 21 cases. The number of new cases alleging a connection between hair relaxing usage and cancer will likely rise steadily throughout the year.

May 11, 2023 – Procedure for New Filings in MDL Class Action Explained

The MDL judge provided an order to guide direct filings of new cases related to the class action hair relaxer lawsuit.

New cases must be separately filed in the Northern District of Illinois, referencing the connection to the MDL on the civil cover sheet.

Each case will receive a unique number and must include specific information regarding Judge Mary Rowland and the master docket number.

May 1, 2023 – Arrival of New Hair Straightener Lawsuits

New hair relaxer lawsuits continued to be filed in the Northern District of Illinois.

A recent suit from a Louisiana woman claimed that her regular and extended exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in L’Oreal’s hair products led to her developing life-threatening uterine cancer and endometriosis.

April 21, 2023 – Hair Relaxer Ban Campaign Ignites in Europe

Prominent UK politicians and women’s activist groups demanded that cosmetic companies, including L’Oreal, remove hair relaxers from the market following research linking these products to uterine fibroids and endometrial cancer.

UK feminist organization Level Up spearheaded the campaign with an open letter urging cosmetic giants to eliminate harmful chemicals from hair relaxers or completely withdraw the products.

April 19, 2023 – Deliberations During Class Action Status Conference

Judge Rowland presided over a status conference with hair relaxer attorneys from both sides of the hair relaxer class action MDL.

The main focus was addressing the admissibility of causation.

While the defendants proposed a two-step process to assess general causation before scrutinizing evidence linking hair-relaxing products to specific cancers, the plaintiffs objected, arguing that this approach could induce unnecessary delays.

April 18, 2023 – Rise in the Hair Relaxer Case Count

In the past month, 24 new cases were incorporated into the hair relaxer class action MDL, raising the total number of lawsuits to 102.

April 6, 2023 – Continuing Surge of New Hair Relaxer Lawsuits

The surge of new hair relaxer lawsuits showed no signs of abating, with over 200 cases across the country, most of which had already joined the MDL.

The wave of new filings is anticipated to rise significantly in the coming months.

March 31, 2023 – Streamlining the Class Action Filing Process

To simplify the process, the MDL in Chicago allowed plaintiffs in the class action hair relaxer lawsuit to file directly in the MDL, bypassing the need to file in their home state.

This method should expedite the legal proceedings for hair relaxer lawyers.

March 27, 2023 – Revlon: An Exception in the Hair Relaxer Lawsuit

Revlon, a significant cosmetic company, had avoided being a defendant in the hair relaxer class action lawsuit due to its bankruptcy filing before the litigation began.

However, the Plaintiffs Steering Committee (PSC) in the hair relaxing MDL has filed a claim in the bankruptcy proceeding to ensure compensation for potential plaintiffs who used Revlon products.

March 16, 2023 – Class Action MDL Welcomes 50 New Cases on Chemical Hair Relaxer Products

Over the past month, the class action MDL incorporated 57 new hair relaxer cancer civil suits, bringing the total number of pending cases to 78.

As the year progresses, the volume of new cases is expected to rise, potentially averaging 200 new cases per month by summer’s end.

March 11, 2023 – Key Takeaways from the Hair Straighteners Lawsuits Status Conference

During the status conference, parties agreed on a course of action for various issues, including direct filing orders, general causation, pleadings/amending complaints, federal and state court coordination, probate matters, and electronically stored information discovery.

March 1, 2023 – Inaugural Status Conference in Class Action MDL

Judge Mary Rowland held the first status conference with all parties of the hair relaxer class action MDL, focusing on forming the plaintiff’s counsel leadership committees to make collective decisions on behalf of all plaintiffs.

She indicated that there would be a single steering committee and named lead and liaison counsel.

February 27, 2023 – Surge in Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Cases

Last week witnessed the highest number of hair relaxer lawsuits filed in federal courts, with 24 cases. Most were filed in the Northern District of Illinois, the hair relaxer multidistrict litigation hub. We predict these dozens of cases will soon turn into thousands, possibly exceeding 100,000.

February 16, 2023 – Further Filings in the Hair Relaxer Cancer Civil Suit MDL

Since February commenced, eleven more lawsuits relating to hair relaxer products were filed in federal courts.

A majority of the cases emerged from the Northern District of Illinois.

The remaining lawsuits were spread across various districts but will eventually integrate into the ongoing hair-relaxing multidistrict litigation.

February 7, 2023 – MDL for Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Approved

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has approved centralizing all hair-relaxing civil suits in federal courts into a new MDL.

Judge Mary Rowland from the Northern District of Illinois has been assigned to preside over the litigation.

Beginning with approximately 60 cases, this new MDL is expected to grow significantly.

February 6, 2023 – Hair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Greenlit

Today, the JPML Panel approved the class action lawsuit concerning hair straightening products. All federal hair-relaxing civil suits will now converge in Illinois.

February 5, 2023 – EPA Sets Sights on Chemicals Hair Relaxers

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has added certain phthalates to its list of harmful toxic chemicals, requiring increased regulations and reporting.

Phthalates are a primary component of chemical hair relaxers, and their potential to disrupt the hormone system and increase uterine cancer risk has spurred this decision.

February 1, 2023 – Anticipation Builds for Hair Relaxer Multidistrict Litigation Ruling

Seven new lawsuits related to hair relaxer products were filed across Maryland, Washington, California, Missouri, and Illinois in the last ten days.

The decision from the JPML to consolidate these cases into a new class action MDL is eagerly awaited to determine hair relaxer settlement amounts.

January 27, 2023 – Hair Relaxer Lawsuit MDL Hearing Commences

The MDL hearing to determine the feasibility of a hair relaxer class action lawsuit was held today in Miami. The panel is likely to deliver its ruling in February.

January 20, 2023 – Steady Increase in Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Filings

The new year has seen a significant increase in filing hair-relaxing civil suits. With six new cases just last week, this litigation trend is poised to grow exponentially.

January 17, 2023 – Consolidation of Hair Straightener/Relaxer Civil Lawsuits

The JPML is set to address the consolidation of hair-relaxing civil suits into an MDL later this month.

The plaintiffs have recently countered the defendants’ argument against consolidation, stating that the JPML frequently consolidates similar cases involving multiple defendants and products.

January 12, 2023 – New Year Ushers in New Hair Straightener Lawsuits

Seven new civil suits have been filed since the start of the year. Uterine cancer was the predominant injury alleged by the plaintiffs.

This does not indicate that most chemical hair straightener lawsuits primarily involve uterine cancer, but it underscores the severe consequences of using hair relaxers.

The Victims’ Stories: Personal Accounts and Impact

Behind every hair relaxer lawsuit is a personal story of struggle, health complications, and a quest for justice. These accounts are not merely narratives; they are the lived experiences of women who have suffered due to the alleged negligence of hair straightener/relaxer manufacturers. Their stories shed light on the human impact of corporate decisions and underscore the importance of holding companies accountable.

Experiences of Women Affected by Hair Relaxer Products

The experiences of women affected by hair relaxers paint a vivid picture of the potential dangers of these products. From dealing with the shock of a cancer diagnosis to confronting the financial burden of medical bills, their testimonies contribute to the collective call for action against negligent manufacturers. These personal accounts are powerful tools in the legal battle, illustrating the real-world consequences of exposure to toxic chemicals.

Disproportionate Impact on African-American Women

It is impossible to overlook the disproportionate impact that hair relaxer use has had on African-American females. Data indicates that they are more likely to develop health issues linked to these products, a disparity that raises questions about targeted marketing and product safety. Acknowledging this disparity is crucial in the fight for equitable justice and compensation.

Entering the legal fray of a hair relaxer cancer civil suit requires a clear understanding of the legal criteria and processes involved in filing a claim. These criteria are the foundation for determining eligibility, while the processes guide plaintiffs through the complex legal landscape. Adhering to these parameters is essential for victims seeking to file a hair relaxer lawsuit.

Eligibility Criteria for Filing a Hair Relaxer Product Lawsuit

The eligibility criteria for filing a hair relaxer lawsuit are specific. They must be strictly followed. Potential plaintiffs must typically provide evidence of product use, medical diagnosis, and a causal link between the two. These criteria ensure that only those with a legitimate claim proceed to the next steps of the legal process.

Steps to File a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit

Filing a hair relaxer cancer civil suit involves several key steps, starting with a consultation with a personal injury lawyer. The process includes gathering evidence, documenting medical history, and filing the necessary legal paperwork within the prescribed time limits. Each step is critical in building a robust hair relaxer lawsuit against the defendants.

Potential Outcomes: Settlements and Verdicts

The conclusion of a hair relaxer lawsuit can result in various outcomes, with settlements and verdicts being the most common. Understanding these potential outcomes is essential for plaintiffs as they navigate the legal process and set their expectations regarding compensation. Both settlements and verdicts carry significant implications for all parties involved.

Understanding Settlements and Payout Amounts

Settlements in hair relaxer civil lawsuits are agreements between plaintiffs and defendants before a case goes to trial. These settlements are influenced by factors such as the strength of the evidence, the severity of the claimant’s condition, and the legal strategy employed. Settlement amounts can vary widely and are often negotiated by experienced hair relaxer attorneys.

The role of legal representation in a hair relaxer lawsuit is indispensable. Skilled product liability lawyers can significantly impact the outcome of a case through their expertise in negotiating settlements, arguing in court, and navigating the complexities of the legal system. Their involvement is often a determining factor in the success of a lawsuit.

lawyers for hair relaxer lawsuits

The Rising Tide of Hair Straightener/Relaxer Litigation

The legal landscape is shifting dramatically with an uptick in hair straightener/relaxer cancer civil suits. Individuals diagnosed with uterine cancer or ovarian cancer following the use of certain hair-relaxing products are increasingly seeking justice. These plaintiffs have launched hair relaxer class action suits, challenging manufacturers over their failure to warn about the risks linked to chemically activated hair straighteners.

A recent flurry of hair relaxer lawsuits filed across various jurisdictions has culminated in substantial hair relaxer settlement amounts for the afflicted. Such product liability claims hold manufacturers accountable for not adequately disclosing the dangers their products pose.

Seeking Justice: Compensation in Hair Relaxer Product Lawsuits

Victims have secured multi-million-dollar awards in hair relaxer litigation for damages such as medical expenses, lost income, and enduring pain and suffering. The hair relaxer lawsuit compensation fluctuates based on the severity of the illness and the duration of product usage.

Product Liability and Hair Relaxer Cancer Claims

Should you or an acquaintance be diagnosed with uterine cancer due to hair straightener/relaxer usage, filing a product liability claim is a critical step. Successful litigation can yield substantial compensation and enforce corporate accountability for negligence.

Embarking on a hair relaxer class action can be daunting. Engaging a seasoned attorney specializing in such cases ensures your rights remain safeguarded and you receive the reparations to which you are entitled.

The Grave Consequence: Hair Straightener/Relaxer Civil Lawsuits and Wrongful Death

Hair relaxer defendants are increasingly facing wrongful death lawsuits due to fatal ovarian and uterine cancers linked to their products. Such cases may encompass extensive damages, covering everything from healthcare costs to the profound grief of bereavement.

Taking Action: Initiating a Hair Relaxer Civil Suit

If developing uterine cancer has impacted your post-hair relaxer use, you might consider legal action against the responsible corporation. A proficient law firm can facilitate your endometrial cancer lawsuit, ensuring the negligent parties are accountable.

Your legal counsel will meticulously manage every facet of your claim, from evidence collection to expert consultations. By presenting indisputable proof and expert opinions, your attorney will aim to secure a settlement that reflects the true extent of your suffering.

Expertise and Advocacy: Building a Solid Case

A distinguished firm will leverage its expertise to establish the correlation between hair relaxer use and an elevated risk of developing life-threatening uterine cancer. Negotiating skills are paramount to achieving a settlement encompassing all facets of your ordeal, potentially leading to further hair-relaxer settlement prospects.

Case Value: Projected Chemical Hair Relaxer Settlement Amount

Our personal injury attorneys expect hair relaxer cancer civil suits will settle soon. We estimate the settlement values on defective hair relaxer products to be based on injury type as follows:

  • Uterine Cancer Lawsuits: Settlements for hair relaxer uterine cancer cases are estimated to range from $300,000 to $1,750,000.
  • Endometriosis Lawsuits: Cases where the primary injury is endometriosis are expected to have settlement values around $110,000 to $300,000.
  • Uterine Fibroid Lawsuits: Settlements involving uterine fibroids as the primary injury are estimated to be between $150,000 and $500,000.
  • Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits: The estimated settlement values range from $400,000 to $750,000​for ovarian cancer cases.

For accurate settlement amounts and jury awards, recently filed chemical hair relaxer cases would need to progress further in the legal process or reach the point of settlement or verdict, which might then be reported.

Defective Hair Relaxer Lawsuit: Frequently Asked Questions

The litigation surrounding hair-relaxing products has garnered significant attention due to allegations that such products, including chemical-based hair relaxers and hair straightening products, may have caused health problems such as uterine cancer.

Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, LLC, is deeply engaged in this conversation, providing guidance and representation to those affected. This FAQ aims to answer pressing questions regarding the ongoing hair straightener/relaxer civil lawsuits.

What Is the Basis for the Hair Relaxer Civil Lawsuits?

The hair straightener/relaxer civil lawsuits allege that companies like L’Oréal and others failed to warn consumers about the dangers of their hair-relaxing products. Plaintiffs assert that they suffered health problems, including uterine cancer, due to exposure to dangerous chemicals like phthalates in these products. The legal claims focus on the companies’ knowledge of the potential harms and their decision to market the products despite these risks.

These lawsuits are anchored in the assertion that manufacturers neglected their duty to ensure product safety and inform consumers of the health risks. They are predicated on the principle that had consumers been properly informed about the carcinogenic potential of the chemicals in hair relaxers, they might have chosen alternative products or avoided them altogether. Central to the litigation is the balance between corporate profit and consumer safety, with allegations suggesting that companies prioritized the former at the expense of public health.

Have Any Lawsuits Been Filed Against Hair Relaxer Manufacturers?

Yes, multiple lawsuits have been filed against manufacturers of hair relaxers. The initial case filed by Jenny Mitchell claimed that long-term use of these products caused her to develop uterine cancer at the age of 28. Since then, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated various lawsuits into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in Illinois, indicating the scale and seriousness of these allegations.

While the majority of the lawsuits highlight the link between hair relaxer use and uterine cancer, there are also cases involving ovarian cancer and uterine fibroids. The litigation addresses various health issues allegedly caused by chemical hair straighteners and hair relaxers.

What Chemicals in Hair Relaxers Are Alleged to Be Harmful?

The lawsuits claim that hair relaxing products contain endocrine-disrupting chemicals, such as phthalates, which have been linked to an elevated risk of uterine cancer and other health issues. These chemicals are said to be present in various popular perm and straightening products marketed primarily to Black women.

The allegations highlight that compounds like formaldehyde and parabens are also among the harmful ingredients used in these products. Research indicates these substances can disrupt hormonal functions and potentially lead to reproductive health problems. The focus of the legal challenges is on the failure to provide adequate warnings about the risks these chemicals pose, especially with prolonged and frequent use.

Is There a Specific Demographic Targeted by These Products?

Yes, the hair relaxer litigation emphasizes that these products were mainly marketed to Black women. This targeting raises concerns about the disproportionate impact of potentially harmful hair relaxer chemicals on this demographic.

The focus of the lawsuits brings attention to the intersection of race, health, and corporate responsibility, suggesting that the aggressive marketing of relaxers to Black women neglected the consideration of their unique health vulnerabilities. This issue highlights the need for inclusivity and safety in product development and marketing. It also raises broader questions about health equity and the ethical obligations of personal care companies to all demographics.

What Are the Potential Consequences for Companies Involved in Hair Relaxer Civil Lawsuits?

If the plaintiffs succeed, companies may face significant legal and financial repercussions, including potential hair relaxer settlements and the need to change their product formulations or warning labels. Such outcomes could also prompt regulatory changes and increased scrutiny of cosmetic companies and their products.

The litigation could lead to a ripple effect beyond the courtroom, influencing public opinion and consumer trust in beauty and personal care brands. A surge in successful claims might also set a precedent for future cases, compelling the industry to adopt more rigorous testing and full disclosure of ingredients.

Moreover, these companies might experience a downturn in market share as consumers seek safer alternatives, potentially reshaping the competitive landscape of the beauty industry.

What Should Individuals Do if They Have Used Hair Relaxers And They May Have Been Harmed?

Individuals who have used hair relaxers and subsequently developed health issues like uterine cancer might consider consulting with a hair relaxer lawyer to discuss potential legal actions. It is vital to gather all relevant medical records and product usage history.

If you suspect harm from hair relaxing products, contacting our legal experts specializing in product liability is crucial. Our professionals can provide guidance on the viability of your claim and the steps involved in pursuing legal recourse. Prompt action is recommended to ensure that any hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are filed within the relevant statutes of limitations, preserving the right to seek compensation for damages incurred.

What Is the Status of Hair Relaxer Civil Lawsuits As of the Latest Updates?

As of the latest updates, dozens of hair relaxer civil lawsuits have been consolidated in Illinois, with the MDL process underway to manage the pretrial proceedings efficiently. These consolidated hair relaxer cases are still in the early stages of litigation.

U.S. District Judge Mary Rowland in Illinois has allowed the majority of claims in these lawsuits to proceed [3], which suggests that the court finds merit in the allegations against hair straightener/relaxer manufacturers like L’Oréal USA and Revlon.

This litigation could set a precedent for how cosmetic companies disclose the presence of dangerous chemicals in their products. It could lead to broader consumer safety measures and more stringent regulations on the hair product industry, especially concerning endocrine-disrupting chemicals like those alleged to be in hair relaxers.

Attorneys for Hair Relaxer Lawsuits

Hiring Our Personal Injury Law Firm to Resolve Your Hair Relaxer Civil Lawsuit

Affected by a hair relaxer product? When you or someone you care about suffers from adverse effects from chemical hair relaxers, the path forward may seem daunting. Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, LLC is a dedicated ally in hair straightener/relaxer civil lawsuits, offering comprehensive legal support to those harmed by these products.

Our experienced personal injury attorneys are committed to seeking justice for our clients, guided by a deep understanding of the complexities associated with hair relaxer litigation.

Here’s how our legal team can assist you:

  • Free Consultation: We provide a no-obligation assessment of your case, ensuring you understand your legal rights and options.
  • Contingency Fee Agreement: Our services are offered on a contingency fee basis, which means you incur no fees unless we secure a settlement or verdict in your favor.
  • In-depth Investigation: We meticulously gather and analyze evidence to establish a strong foundation for your hair relaxer lawsuit.
  • Medical Insights: Our network includes medical professionals who can substantiate the link between hair relaxer use and your injuries.
  • Expert Negotiations: Leveraging our knowledge of hair relaxer cancer cases, we negotiate with defendants and insurance companies to reach fair settlements.
  • Trial Readiness: If a settlement cannot be reached, we will take your case to trial, advocating fiercely on your behalf.

Our product liability lawyers are dedicated to building effective strategies tailored to secure the financial compensation you deserve for damages such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. We understand the significant impact that endocrine-disrupting chemicals found in hair-relaxing products can have on your life, including increasing the risk of uterine cancer and endometrial cancer. It is our mission to hold negligent cosmetic companies accountable.

Affected by a hair relaxer product? Do not wait to pursue justice. Contact Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, LLC today to schedule your free consultation. We are committed to representing individuals affected by hair relaxer chemicals, fighting to ensure you receive the compensation you need to move forward with your life.

Resources: [1] NIH, [2] ilnd.uscourts.gov, [3] ilnd.uscourts.gov

Client Reviews

Jonathan Rosenfeld was professionally objective, timely, and knowledgeable. Also, his advice was extremely effective regarding my case. In addition, Jonathan was understanding and patient pertaining to any of my questions or concerns. I was very happy with the end result and I highly recommend Jonathan Rosenfeld.

- Michonne Proulx

Extremely impressed with this law firm. They took control of a bad motorcycle crash that left my uncle seriously injured. Without any guarantee of a financial recovery, they went out and hired accident investigators and engineers to help prove how the accident happened. I am grateful that they worked on a contingency fee basis as there was no way we could have paid for these services on our own.

- Ethan Armstrong

Jonathan helped my family heal and get compensation after our child was suffered a life threatening injury at daycare. He was sympathetic and in constant contact with us letting us know all he knew every step of the way. We were so blessed to find Jonathan!

- Giulia

This lawyer really helped me get compensation for my motorcycle accident case. I know there is no way that I could have gotten anywhere near the amount that Mr. Rosenfeld was able to get to settle my case. Thank you.

- Daniel Kaim

Jonathan did a great job helping my family navigate through a lengthy lawsuit involving my grandmother's death in a nursing home. Through every step of the case, Jonathan kept my family informed of the progression of the case. Although our case eventually settled at a mediation, I really was impressed at how well prepared Jonathan was to take the case to trial.

- Lisa
Free Consultation (888) 424-5757
TAP TO CALL TAP TO TEXT